Skip to content

Project governance and sustainability

What enterprise evaluators can determine from published documentation and repository policy. This is not a commercial vendor statement.

Project model

Aspect Status
Product Open-source OntoCode (VS Code) + OntoIndex (Rust engine)
License MIT OR Apache-2.0 (application crates); third-party licenses in LICENSES.md
Distribution GitHub Releases (VSIX, CLI, LSP), VS Code Marketplace, crates.io
Commercial support Not offered — community via GitHub issues
Vendor / company Not documented as a separate legal entity

Fortune 500 teams should plan internal OSS adoption with their own escalation path and pinned versions.

Release cadence (observed)

Recent documented releases (see changelog):

Version Date (changelog)
0.8.0 2026-06-26
0.7.0 2026-06-25
0.6.0 2026-06-24

Pre-1.0 releases may ship frequently. No committed future cadence is documented.

Maintainers follow releasing.md: version bump, CHANGELOG, SHIPPED matrix, mkdocs build --strict, ./scripts/check-doc-versions.sh, GitHub Release artifacts with SHA256SUMS and NOTICES.

Version support policy

Stream Security support (documented)
0.8.x Yes — security policy
0.7.x Best effort
≤ 0.6.x No

Pin versions in CI and desktop rollouts; do not assume automatic long-term backports.

Security response

  • Report via GitHub Security Advisories — not public issues
  • Acknowledgment target: within a few business days (SECURITY.md)
  • No published SLA for patch delivery
  • Historical advisories: check the repository Security tab (not summarized in docs)

Supply chain: cargo audit in CI; release integrity via SHA256 — release integrity. Code signing: not shipped.

Quality gates (documented)

Gate Where documented
Rust CI (fmt, clippy, tests) README, contributing.md
Extension tests + VS Code E2E README, contributing
MkDocs strict build releasing.md
Doc version sync ./scripts/check-doc-versions.sh

Roadmap governance

Contributing

Community contributions welcome — contributing.md. No documented contributor license agreement beyond standard GitHub inbound licensing.

Enterprise implications

Question Documented answer
Bus factor / team size Not documented
Funding model Not documented
Paid enterprise tier Not offered
Partner program Not documented
SOC 2 / ISO Not claimed — production readiness